Samsung Galaxy S26+ Review: A Genuinely Good Phone With a Genuinely Awkward Job
The Galaxy S26+ has flagship silicon, a great display, and solid battery life — its real problem is the Galaxy S26 Ultra sitting one shelf over. Our full verdict on Samsung's middle child.
Samsung has had the same problem with its Plus-tier flagship for years, and the Galaxy S26+ doesn't solve it. PhoneArena's review put it bluntly, calling the S26+ "a perfectly good phone with no reason to exist" — not because anything is actually wrong with it, but because the Galaxy S26 Ultra sitting one shelf over makes a far stronger case for the extra money, while the base Galaxy S26 undercuts it on price. GSMArena's own framing is similarly blunt: it's "not the cheapest nor the smallest option" and, year after year, "consistently gets the lowest sales numbers out of the trio." That framing is worth taking seriously, but it shouldn't obscure that the S26+ is, on its own terms, a genuinely capable flagship.
Design and Build
The design is a subtle refinement rather than a rework — a new unified glass camera housing replaces the separated lens rings of the S25+, and Samsung added a couple of new color options this generation. Android Central's review noted that Samsung introduced the well-received Galaxy S25 Edge last year and seemed to have the ingredients for a genuinely distinctive Plus model in 2026, but the S26+ doesn't build on that — it's the same familiar Armor aluminum frame and Gorilla Glass Victus construction as its predecessor, just with a slightly different camera bump. That camera housing change isn't purely cosmetic, either, and it's worth flagging the trade-off honestly: Android Central's hands-on testing found the new housing protrudes noticeably more than the S25+'s individual lens rings did, causing the phone to wobble more on flat surfaces — a real, physical downside to what reads as a purely visual update on a spec sheet.
Protection is IP68 as standard, which GSMArena's own pros-and-cons summary flags as a genuine, disclosed step behind rivals now offering IP68/IP69 combinations for added resistance to high-pressure water jets. The box itself is a minimalist affair — Samsung's continued eco-friendly packaging push means a plain, recycled cardboard box printed in soy ink, with just a basic USB Type-C cable included and no charger or case bundled. Connectivity runs to Wi-Fi 7, dual physical SIM slots on international units (a single slot plus eSIM in the US), and satellite messaging support, though GSMArena notes carrier rollout of that feature specifically has been uneven so far, with Verizon offering it on the S26 series and AT&T only recently following suit. The fingerprint reader is an under-display ultrasonic unit, positioned at a comfortable height on the screen — a small ergonomic detail, but one GSMArena's hands-on testing specifically praised as working reliably rather than needing repeated attempts.
Display
A 6.7-inch QHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel at 120Hz with a marketed 2,800 nits peak brightness — genuinely excellent on paper, and the single clearest reason to pick the S26+ over the compact 6.3-inch base Galaxy S26 if screen size and immersion matter more to you than one-handed use. GSMArena's own standardised measurement found a more modest 755 nits with the Extra Brightness toggle maxed out, and 510 nits without it, neither of which is class-leading for outdoor visibility — a real gap between the marketed figure and daily real-world brightness worth knowing before assuming this outshines every rival in direct sun. It's effectively unchanged from the S25+'s display otherwise, which is only a criticism in the sense that it means this generation offers nothing new here, and GSMArena's own pros-and-cons list flags the display as missing 10-bit colour depth, high-frequency PWM dimming, and Dolby Vision support — genuine, disclosed omissions given Samsung's own display-manufacturing leadership elsewhere in the industry.
Camera
The 50MP main, 12MP ultrawide, and 10MP 3x telephoto array is capable and consistent in good and moderate light, with Samsung's AI-assisted processing tools like Audio Eraser layered on top this generation. But it's the same core camera hardware Back Market's review found essentially unchanged from the S25+, and it's a clear step down from the Ultra's 200MP main sensor if photography specifically is the priority — a genuine, honest gap rather than a marginal spec-sheet difference. GSMArena's pros-and-cons list does credit one genuine, specific strength: the selfie camera is excellent and, unusually for this tier, comes with autofocus rather than a fixed-focus module. Video recording is versatile too, with LUTs and Horizon Lock among the feature set — though it's worth an honest caveat that video tops out below the Ultra's capability, lacking both 4K120 recording and the APV codec support Samsung reserved specifically for its flagship model. Both photo and video output support the Android Ultra HDR standard, which shows brighter highlights and improved dynamic range not just in Samsung's own Gallery app but in Google Photos and even Chrome when viewing supported images — a small but genuinely useful piece of cross-platform consistency. GSMArena's testers also found the Night mode implementation unintuitive in day-to-day use, a small but real usability rough edge on an otherwise dependable system. This is the sharpest illustration of the S26+'s positioning problem: it's a genuinely good camera system that simply isn't the reason anyone chooses this phone over its siblings.
Performance
This is the section where the "identical to the Ultra" framing needs an important, easily-missed correction: which chip you get depends entirely on where you buy. Samsung has gone back to its regional two-chipset strategy this generation — buyers in the US, China, and South Korea get the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, the same 3nm chip powering the Galaxy S26 Ultra everywhere in the world. Everyone else, including the UK and the entire EU, gets Samsung's own Exynos 2600 instead — genuinely different silicon, not a rebrand or a minor binning difference. This matters because the S26+'s biggest selling point on paper — Ultra-adjacent performance without the Ultra price — only fully holds up for Snapdragon-market buyers; UK and EU buyers are comparing an Exynos-powered S26+ against a Snapdragon-powered Ultra, a materially different comparison than the marketing suggests, and one worth knowing before assuming price parity means performance parity too. It's a genuinely easy detail to miss, since Samsung's own UK and EU marketing doesn't foreground it the way an independent review necessarily has to.
The good news is the Exynos 2600 is a genuinely competitive chip this generation rather than a clear downgrade, built on a 2nm process with real AI-acceleration focus — Notebookcheck's testing found it performs very well in Geekbench AI specifically, and Android Authority's own benchmarking found the Exynos variant actually ran marginally faster than the Snapdragon version in the later stages of a sustained thermal test, with ray-tracing gaming performance exceeding 110fps in performance mode. Android Authority's broader assessment is direct that this generation puts chips like Google's Tensor G5 to shame, a real step up from the Exynos 2400 two generations back. The honest weak spot is single-core CPU performance, which Notebookcheck's own benchmarking found performing well behind the Snapdragon variant in that specific metric even though multi-core scores are much closer — and sustained gaming load is a genuine, measured concern too, with independent testing finding the chip reaching nearly 50°C after 30 minutes of demanding gameplay and triggering real thermal throttling. Android Authority's own candid assessment is that while Exynos has closed much of the gap, it will probably take another couple of generations to fully replace Snapdragon as Samsung's default choice worldwide. RAM is fixed at 12GB across both storage tiers, with 256GB and 512GB UFS 4.X options — no 8GB or 16GB variant to choose between, which simplifies the buying decision even if it removes some flexibility rival flagships offer. One UI 8.5 on Android 16 remains polished regardless of which chip is underneath, and Samsung's committed 7-year OS and security update window is class-leading, matching Google's and Honor's best current policies.
Battery and Charging
A 4,900mAh cell with 45W wired SuperFast Charging and 20W Qi2 wireless charging delivers comfortably all-day battery life for typical use, and it's a real, if modest, step up from the base Galaxy S26's 4,300mAh. Worth a precise correction here, since it's an easy figure to get wrong: the S26+ carries the same 4,900mAh capacity as last year's S25+ — unchanged, not upgraded — and it sits just 100mAh behind the Ultra's own 5,000mAh cell, a far smaller real-world gap than the marketing tiers imply. GSMArena's own testing found the Exynos 2600 delivering great sustained CPU performance alongside genuinely very good battery life, crediting software efficiency improvements as much as the hardware itself for the result.
Verdict
GSMTechTok Verdict
Taken entirely on its own, the Galaxy S26+ is an excellent phone — flagship-tier performance, a great display, and dependable battery life with no significant flaws. The honest catch, echoed across nearly every independent review, is that it exists in the shadow of its own sibling: the Galaxy S26 Ultra offers a meaningfully better camera and the S Pen for a price gap that many buyers will conclude is worth paying, while the base Galaxy S26 delivers most of the same core experience in a smaller, cheaper package. The S26+ earns its recommendation specifically for buyers who want a bigger screen than the base model without stepping all the way up to Ultra pricing — not as a default pick in Samsung's 2026 flagship lineup.
GSMArena's own pros-and-cons summary captures the balance fairly: premium build quality, a great LTPO AMOLED display, very good battery life, genuinely great sustained CPU performance from the Exynos 2600, and Samsung's class-leading 7-year update commitment are all real, unambiguous strengths. Against that sit a genuinely minor generational upgrade over the S25+, a base IP68 rating where some rivals now offer IP69 too, display specs that stop short of 10-bit colour and Dolby Vision, an unintuitive Night mode, and video recording that falls short of the Ultra's 4K120 and APV codec support. None of these individually sink the phone, but together they explain precisely why so many reviewers reach the same conclusion: easy to like, surprisingly difficult to specifically recommend over its own siblings. Snapdragon-market buyers in the US, China, and Korea get a stronger case than UK and EU buyers do, purely because their S26+ runs the same silicon as the Ultra rather than Samsung's own Exynos alternative — worth weighing specifically if you're comparing prices across regions rather than shopping locally.
Frequently Asked Questions
The Ultra gets a 200MP main camera versus the S26+'s 50MP, a built-in S Pen slot, a larger 6.9-inch display versus 6.7 inches, and a 5,000mAh battery versus the S26+'s 4,900mAh — a real but much smaller gap than older Galaxy generations, all for roughly £300 more. Chip parity between the two depends entirely on region, too: the Ultra runs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 everywhere, but the S26+ only matches it in the US, China, and South Korea — UK and EU buyers get Samsung's own Exynos 2600 instead, genuinely different silicon rather than a rebadge.
Not really, and reviewers were consistent on this point — Back Market's review found the display, core camera hardware, and battery capacity are essentially unchanged from the S25+, with the main differences being a new unified camera housing design, six color options, and incremental AI software features like Audio Eraser. If you already own an S25+, there's little urgency to upgrade specifically to the S26+.
Someone who wants the S26 Ultra's bigger, sharper 6.7-to-6.9-inch display and slightly larger battery than the compact base Galaxy S26, but doesn't care about the S Pen or the highest-resolution camera and doesn't want to pay the Ultra's premium. It's a genuine size-and-battery upgrade over the base S26 for a smaller price jump than going all the way to the Ultra — just don't expect it to feel meaningfully different from last year's Plus model.
Price history · 90 days · GBP
Galaxy S26+
Current
£999
90d Low
£935
17 Aug
90d High
£1,018
5 Oct
Launch price
£999
All-time low ↓
Price tracking from major UK retailers. Updated daily. Prices may vary.
How it compares: Galaxy S26+ vs Galaxy S26 Ultra
Samsung
Galaxy S26+
From £999
Samsung
Galaxy S26 Ultra
From £1,299
6.7" QHD+ 120Hz
Display
6.9" QHD+ 120Hz
50MP triple, 3x optical
Main cam
200MP + S Pen
Exynos 2600 / SD 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
4,900mAh · 45W
Battery
5,000mAh · 60W
From £999
Price
From £1,299
Related Reviews
87Samsung Galaxy S26+ Review: A Genuinely Good Phone With a Genuinely Awkward Job
From £999
91iPhone 17 Pro Max Review: The Best Battery Life on Any iPhone, Wrapped in a Design That Divides Opinion
From £1,040
84iQOO Neo 11 Review: Full Flagship Silicon at a Mid-Range Price, If You Can Live Without the Camera Bragging Rights
From £520
Comments
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts.